<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brillante Mendoza, &quot;Tirador&quot; (2007).</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filmeyeballsbrain.com/2009/01/11/brillante-mendoza-tirador-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filmeyeballsbrain.com/2009/01/11/brillante-mendoza-tirador-2007/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:19:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://filmeyeballsbrain.com/2009/01/11/brillante-mendoza-tirador-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmeyeballsbrain.wordpress.com/?p=436#comment-58</guid>
		<description>doesn&#039;t tirador ask what the connection between the religious and the political is in slum hopes--think kubrador, insiang, la visa loca? the very materiality of the political campaign become material for survival and the space/milieu: clearly we don&#039;t want to be there. no surprise that people want to leave. but then, who is the tirador aimed at? clearly there are no &quot;people&quot; here, just un-merciless situationist imagery--porn without the enjoyment. do we really want to watch that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doesn&#8217;t tirador ask what the connection between the religious and the political is in slum hopes&#8211;think kubrador, insiang, la visa loca? the very materiality of the political campaign become material for survival and the space/milieu: clearly we don&#8217;t want to be there. no surprise that people want to leave. but then, who is the tirador aimed at? clearly there are no &#8220;people&#8221; here, just un-merciless situationist imagery&#8211;porn without the enjoyment. do we really want to watch that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Vergara</title>
		<link>http://filmeyeballsbrain.com/2009/01/11/brillante-mendoza-tirador-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Vergara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmeyeballsbrain.wordpress.com/?p=436#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I agree with you there, Oscar; it just doesn&#039;t seem that there&#039;s much at stake for the viewer in terms of identification. I suspect that Mendoza was resisting the &quot;mistake&quot; of making the characters more sympathetic, but it has the opposite effect of making the director look like he&#039;s looking at flies trapped in a jar before pulling off their wings.

The camera work is indeed great (there&#039;s an even longer single-take shot in &quot;Foster Child&quot;, which you should also see). Speaking of camera work (and how it reflected their frenetic lives), I was reminded, in contrast, of how Lav Diaz&#039;s &quot;Evolution of a Filipino Family&quot; does deal with the urban and rural poor as well, except that -- as can be expected from its ten and a half hour running time -- very little happens. Much of their lives is spent waiting for jeepneys that never arrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you there, Oscar; it just doesn&#8217;t seem that there&#8217;s much at stake for the viewer in terms of identification. I suspect that Mendoza was resisting the &#8220;mistake&#8221; of making the characters more sympathetic, but it has the opposite effect of making the director look like he&#8217;s looking at flies trapped in a jar before pulling off their wings.</p>
<p>The camera work is indeed great (there&#8217;s an even longer single-take shot in &#8220;Foster Child&#8221;, which you should also see). Speaking of camera work (and how it reflected their frenetic lives), I was reminded, in contrast, of how Lav Diaz&#8217;s &#8220;Evolution of a Filipino Family&#8221; does deal with the urban and rural poor as well, except that &#8212; as can be expected from its ten and a half hour running time &#8212; very little happens. Much of their lives is spent waiting for jeepneys that never arrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valeriesoe</title>
		<link>http://filmeyeballsbrain.com/2009/01/11/brillante-mendoza-tirador-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>valeriesoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmeyeballsbrain.wordpress.com/?p=436#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Ha! Slum porn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Slum porn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscar</title>
		<link>http://filmeyeballsbrain.com/2009/01/11/brillante-mendoza-tirador-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmeyeballsbrain.wordpress.com/?p=436#comment-57</guid>
		<description>My big takeaway-- Wherever this is happening, I don&#039;t want to be there.

Which is an awful thing to say but Tirador doesn&#039;t give me one good thing to hold on to and say &quot;Ok, these are people who are just trying to get by and life/politics/the City get in the way.&quot;  Instead I&#039;m given, &quot;Not only are poor people bad, but they do everything they can to make their situation even worse and there is no sense in trying to save them.&quot;

On the flip side, I am appreciating how the narrative revolves around Quiapo itself and not any one person in particular and how this is rendered with Mendoza&#039;s insanely long and intricate single take shots in (what I&#039;m assuming) is Quiapo.   One take in particular started on one story line, went down through the building, follows a basketball game, then deftly starts off a new story line and without a hitch.

If this had been the story of at least one family, one crew of Jammers (that&#039;s the name for Flip B-boys, right?), even if it all at least happened in one day, it might have let me take a deeper look into the systematic poverty of Quiapo and walked away caring a bit more for it as not just a slum but as a real home to real folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My big takeaway&#8211; Wherever this is happening, I don&#8217;t want to be there.</p>
<p>Which is an awful thing to say but Tirador doesn&#8217;t give me one good thing to hold on to and say &#8220;Ok, these are people who are just trying to get by and life/politics/the City get in the way.&#8221;  Instead I&#8217;m given, &#8220;Not only are poor people bad, but they do everything they can to make their situation even worse and there is no sense in trying to save them.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the flip side, I am appreciating how the narrative revolves around Quiapo itself and not any one person in particular and how this is rendered with Mendoza&#8217;s insanely long and intricate single take shots in (what I&#8217;m assuming) is Quiapo.   One take in particular started on one story line, went down through the building, follows a basketball game, then deftly starts off a new story line and without a hitch.</p>
<p>If this had been the story of at least one family, one crew of Jammers (that&#8217;s the name for Flip B-boys, right?), even if it all at least happened in one day, it might have let me take a deeper look into the systematic poverty of Quiapo and walked away caring a bit more for it as not just a slum but as a real home to real folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
